A hugely controversial decision to refuse planning permission for a farm shop in Silsden has been upheld by a Government Inspector.
Plans by Isherwood’s butchers to build a new farm shop and café next to the golf driving range on Keighley Road in the town had attracted a huge amount of local support, with over 900 people writing letters of support for the planning application.
But in April, Bradford Council’s Keighley and Shipley Planning Panel refused the plans.
Planning officers had argued that the site lay in the Green Belt, and national planning policies said such developments would be inappropriate.
The panel agreed, and voted to refuse the farm shop.
In the wake of the refusal Keighley MP Robbie Moore called the panel’s decision “hypocritical and non sensical.”
Isherwoods then lodged an appeal against the refusal – meaning it would be a Government appointed inspector, and not Bradford Council, that would have final say on whether the farm shop could be built.
The business argued they needed to expand, and there was no other location in Silsden town centre that could meet its needs. The farm shop would represent a huge investment, and create local jobs.
The appeal claimed that planning officers had presented “very biased information” to the panel, and urged a planning inspector to visit the site.
It said the plans had huge support, “including from our local MP (then) Defra Agriculture Minister Robbie Moore.”
Planning Inspector T Burnham was appointed to decide on the appeal, and visited the site on 28th August.
In the appeal decision that has just been published, they concluded that the planning panel had made the right decision, and argued there was “no special circumstances” to throw out national Green Belt policies in this case.
Explaining the decision, the inspector said: “The (planning) framework establishes that the construction of new buildings within the green belt should be regarded as inappropriate unless they are a type of building identified under a list of exceptions.
“The proposal does not form an exception. nor does it constitute development considered not inappropriate in the green belt. The proposal would therefore be inappropriate development in the green belt.
“A fundamental aim of green belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. The essential characteristics of green belts are their openness and their permanence.
“The proposed building would be prominent within views from the adjacent road which is set slightly above the level of the site. Depending on the direction of travel and position on the road of the user, the building would restrict views along the Aire Valley.
“Consequently, there would be a harmful loss of openness of the green belt. The proposal would undermine one of the purposes of the green belt at this location to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas.
“The largely undeveloped nature of the site which allows extensive views through the site along the Aire Valley contributes positively to the character and appearance of the area.
“It is likely that the proposal, which would see an apparently popular business move from the centre of Silsden, would serve to erode the retail function of the local centre of Silsden and would not be in line with the desire to minimise the need to travel.”
Concluding, the decision report says: “The proposal would be inappropriate development within the green belt and would be harmful to green belt openness and would conflict with one of the purposes of including land within the green belt.
“There would be harm to the character and appearance of the area. The site would not be suitable for a farm shop and café in relation to its location having regard to development plan policy and other considerations.
“The very special circumstances necessary to justify the development do not exist.”
Robbie Moore MP told us: “This is completely bonkers and stinks of hypocrisy. It is beyond belief that the Isherwood’s application for a local farm shop has been dismissed by planners on the basis it would be harmful to the green belt. And yet, at the very same time, Labour-run Bradford Council are happy to inundate Silsden with new housing developments, and our new Labour Prime Minister wants to rip up the greenbelt for housing.
“It seems that if it is a housing application, then it is ok, but if it is a local family business wanting to grown and expand, create jobs, boost the local economy, and provide a service for Silsden which is backed by huge local support, then Labour’s attitude is completely dismissive.
“Did the planning inspector actually open their eyes when they came for a visit? This whole situation is ludicrous and lacks common-sense. I feel deeply for the Isherwood family, and indeed Silsden’s residents who have yet again been subjected to Labour’s clear double standards.
“We are now in a situation where Silsden will get even more housing but little infrastructure to service them. Labour need to realise that it is the consent of local people which should come first, not the wishes of housing developers.”
First steps to replace the country’s leakiest hospital
Council endorses Bolton Abbey plan for 'sensitive' tourism-led development
Local bus firm launches £1 fares for young people
Northern reveals why dating apps are blocked on board trains
North Yorkshire Police warns of bogus parking fines
More than £3,700 raised for Airedale Hospital at charity golf day
Addingham Beer Festival returns for the 13th time in October
Exclusive beer launched to promote Skipton festival
New details emerge about Airedale Hospital rebuild
Buses replace Bradford trains on Sundays until November
Bus driver racially abused in Skipton
MP ‘quietly confident’ Airedale hospital rebuild will go ahead
Council asks for £90,000 from mayor to progress Engine Shed Lane scheme
North Yorkshire police marks national 999 day
Another successful Silsden Proms raises thousands for local charities
Skipton high street named among UK's best
County-wide Yarn Trail set to return
Urgent appeal to find missing 15-year-old boy
Stump Cross Caverns boss passes ownership to son
